Skip to main content

Scoring and Weight Configuration in Performance Reviews

Performance review scoring is determined through a combination of template-level configuration and cycle-level settings. Both must be aligned to ensure accurate and consistent score calculations.

Updated today

Template-Level Scoring Configuration

Templates define what contributes to the score and how individual elements are weighted within a review.

Enabling Scoring in Templates

To configure scoring in a template:

  • Enable the Score toggle

  • Select which components should contribute to the score:

    • Questions

    • Goals

    • Competencies

You can include one or more of these components depending on your review requirements.

Weight Distribution

Once scoring is enabled:

  • You must assign weights to the selected components

  • The total weight must equal 100%

Question-Level Weighting

If Questions are included in scoring:

  • All scorable questions (e.g., scale, rating-based) must be assigned individual weights

  • The combined weight of all included questions must equal 100% within the Questions category

This ensures that each question contributes proportionally to the overall score.

Goals and Competencies Weighting

If Goals and/or Competencies are included:

  • Assign weights to each selected component

  • These weights contribute to the overall template score distribution

For example:

  • Questions: 50%

  • Goals: 30%

  • Competencies: 20%

Total = 100%

Cycle-Level Scoring Configuration

At the review cycle level, administrators define which processes contribute to scoring and how scores are aggregated across review steps.

Scorable Components in a Cycle

You can enable scoring for the following components:

  • Employee Score (derived from review templates)

  • Goals

    • Goal Assessment

    • Goal Creation

  • Competencies

Only selected components will be included in the final score calculation.

Template and Cycle Alignment

For a template to be used in a review process:

  • The scoring components enabled in the template must match those enabled in the cycle

Example:

  • If a template includes Goals and Competencies

  • The cycle must also have Goals and Competencies enabled

If there is a mismatch, the template will not be available for selection.

Process-Level Weighting (Review Steps)

In addition to template scoring, you can define how much each review process contributes to the final score.

Available Processes

  • Self Review

  • Manager Review

  • Contributor Review

  • Upward Review

Assigning Process Weights

  • Each enabled review process is assigned a percentage weight

  • The total across all processes must equal 100%

Example:

  • Manager Review: 70%

  • Self Review: 30%

This means:

  • 70% of the final score is derived from the manager’s evaluation

  • 30% is derived from the employee’s self-assessment

Final Score Calculation

The final performance score is calculated by combining:

  1. Template-Level Weights

    • Distribution across Questions, Goals, and Competencies

  2. Process-Level Weights

    • Distribution across review types (e.g., Manager vs Self)

  3. Cycle-Level Component Selection

    • Determines which elements are included in scoring

How It Comes Together

  • Individual responses are scored based on template configuration

  • Scores are aggregated within each review process

  • Process weights are applied

  • A final weighted score is calculated for the employee

Key Rules to Remember

  • All weights (template and process) must total 100%

  • All scorable questions must have assigned weights if included

  • Template and cycle scoring settings must align

  • Only enabled components contribute to the final score

Did this answer your question?